"the amount of salt in this thread proves that Pimax is now a cult. When faced with reality, its followers act as all cults do. Deny deny deny. Invent a new reality. Attack the messengers. Believe it will all be magically solved any day now (in software). Claim anyone pointing out flaws in the products is âagainst VRâs progress. Cult*.â
This individual lacks any credibility to objectively report on Pimax technology and should have his articles on the subject removed.
Thanks.
James Heaney has gone too far this time, masquerading his crusade against Pimax and their backers as objective journalism. He is against VRâs progress.
Well he kind of is right. We have certainly a couple of, very loud, people here on this forum behaving like that. Obviously not all, but thereâs most certainly a cult side present here on this forum (just like with Tesla, Apple or other products like that by the way).
David Heaney is in the worst troll category and I canât believe anyone would publish without checking anything about them. He has said over and over anyone interested in Pimax is a total idiot.
My argument isnât whether or not Pimax Kickstarter backers are cult worshipers, my argument is that a person who openly accuses us of being cult worshipers shouldnât be the journalist charged with reporting on Pimax for the top VR blog on the internet. Critical journalism should at least attempt to hold objective bias, and this author clearly does not. They should find someone else to report on Pimax.
I havenât been following this guy. But can you post a link to that? I donât think anyone interested in pimax is an idiot at all. If he really said that, then he was the idiot himself.
Heaney is playing pimax down & blowing up itâs flaws.
Some are playing it up & skimming over itâs flaws.
Look for the facts in the middle of the 2.
I believe the pimax headsets will be a big success but I also believe were in for a bumpy ride
Well I kind of agree. Journalists shouldnât have bias. But man, if you look at reality, most journalists at newspapers like the New York times literally HATE trump, still they report on him. I guess weâre all human and everybody has their bias. Yet of course I agree that bias in general is very bad in journalism.
A good community is diverse, different, mixed and we have that. We have fans, critics, loud, intelligent, quiet and even the odd conspiracy theorists and we challenge and raise all sorts of discussions, itâs actually a top forum this.
To be a cult you just ban everybody but the most loyal fans but that hasnât happened (thanks Helio). If we suddenly get new moderators then who knows
Yeah thatâs true. If some of those cult types would be in charge, this whole forum would indeed become a cult. And there are forums like that out there.
Mainly the baseless speculation stemming from a false premise, that premise being that Pimax controllers are thumbpad only, when backers have a choice between thumbpad, thumbstick, or a mix of the two. Even cursory research would have revealed this fact, so given his transparent agenda, I am led to believe his deception is deliberate. He could have made the argument that Pimax controllers are inferior without resorting to untruths, but he chose to portray them as being different than they actually are.
Just saying I think itâs hard to be 100% unbiased and if it doesnât even happen in professional news papers, then itâs probably an illusion to think it will happen in tech articles. Yet, sure, bias sucks.
I think there is a line between bias and zealotry. Bias would be where one states a problem and embellishes it one way or the other. A zealot will of course characterize problems highly negatively (or positively) but they will also go after people with opposing views personally. Some get âtriggeredâ and do it occasionally but consistency is how you spot a zealot.
Oh, that is âtheâ Heaney from /r/Oculus? The grand leader of the oculus fanboys cult!
Iâve never seen anyone so intent on twisting and spinning facts to ensure oculus is maintained in a highest of light and everything and everyone else to be considered dirt.
The insufferable fanboy that Palmer Luckey once referred to Heaney as continues to be beyond capable of any reasonable product review without ensuring if itâs not oculus itâs not good enough.
Iâve seen plenty of negativity in /r/vive and /r/oculus with regards to pimax, but the overall tone is very different in the Oculus side, with much more protective behaviour from some. Granted its still a vocal minority that just crops up âa lotâ with which Heaney being around the top of that list! Iâm not tarring everyone with the same brush here, just the irony of the mention of a pimax cult.
I looked at that article and you can just see straight away the fact he mentions âlack of thumbstickâ as something to put people off when we know thatâs something pimax have been offering a choice of options since the Kickstarter. Thanks for making me realise who that is writing there!