I’m a bit curious… Do you know (if things are at a stage where there is any knowing to be had, and the engineers keep other parts of the organisation informed), how the automatic IPD adjuster deals with face asymmetry?
For my own part, I typically have to shift any entire headset a little to the left, to get both lenses aligned simultaneously (…which is also unfortunate from a face gasket fitment-, and consequently comfort-, perspective).
If the renders from Frontier day is anything to go by, the new HMD will use an identical pair of mitre-gear-linked worm gears as previous devices, and a single servo driving them both together, so I have to assume the same sort of moving-the-HMD-over-one’s-face, mentioned above, will still be necessary for not perfectly symmetrical users. (Either allowing separate motion for each lens, or at least making the connector between the HMD proper and the gasket in such a way that they can be laterally shifted relative to one another, would help with comfort).
Will the IPD analysis software be able to tell if there is no place where it can get both eyes aligned at the same time, and if so: How will it handle such situations? -Maybe by prompting the user to:" please shift the HMD X mm to the left/right"? Perhaps also be able to tell the same for eye height, for each eye individually, and prompt moving it up/down/twist? HMD tilt as well, maybe (EDIT:…and a solution to make tilting possible)?
There is an argument to be made, that if the sweetspot of the lenses is sufficiently large, it wouldn’t matter much, and that setting one’s lens spacing to a “happy medium”, between one’s left and right pupillary distance would be well good enough; But short of some situations with lightfield displays, I am pretty sure there is always going to be noticeable benefits to being optimally aligned…