You have the right to an opinion. So do I. My opinion is your opinion is wrong. You were not mislead into a purchase at all.
3 Likes
Oh, that’s not allowed either?
I’m not an apologist. I’m just Your average consumer who has other stuff to care about than specific wordings… 
1 Like
I don’t, but information on the subject is due - not sweeping the issue under the rug as all the other officially announced but unaddressed items have been.
Then how can you say that they’re breaking any laws?
1 Like
This topic is pointless. 
3 Likes
Because misleading comments about accessories, product specifications and performance characteristics are illegal?
It’s not misleading at all. The comment on lenses, even if it was hypothetically a confirmation of anything, carries no dates.
1 Like
Be careful he has ‘legal rights’ 
2 Likes
I’m seriously interested now. Could You show me a case where an employee of a company was convicted for making such comment on a forum?
It is quite misleading as the official statement talked about new developments specifically relating to lenses which were unnannounced, which are comments “likely to create a false impression” about product specifications and accessories.
If Pimax never releases a new, totally different controller design as they said then thats a clear cut case for false advertising.
And guess what - It also applies to any statements made by businesses in the media or online, and on social media.
No it’s not. There’s not a judge in the entire world that would agree on that. “There’s a lot I wish I could tell you but I can’t.” is so vague it could mean anything.
3 Likes
Cmon @Mantidtings breath Bro, take a walk in the park, smoke some cigarettes and look for some girls. This is not the end.
1 Like
If I’ve been given a false impression - I’m quite sure beyond any reasonable doubt others have been mislead as well. I’m quite a reasonable person.
We’ll have to take Your word for it… 
So you’re telling me no judge would agree with me when they clearly confirmed a new controller design which looks nothing like it previously did, if they never release it?
“This rule applies to their advertising, their product packaging, and any information provided to you by their staff or online shopping services. It also applies to any statements made by businesses in the media or online, such as testimonials on their websites or social media pages.”
Listen man, “Regarding lenses, there is a lot I wish I could tell you, but at this point I cant.” is not misleading at all. That could be in regard to better replacement lenses in the future. Not to mention the pre-orders came up today, and nothing of new lenses was mentioned at all in Pimax Day 2. Why’ed you even pre-order one? Just to complain that it has no new lenses? Not even to mention, that you can probably still cancel your pre-order if you just email Pimax. Obviously you’re just looking to make financial gain off this.
1 Like
Sure. We can agree on that. However if no updated controller design and updated tracking design is ever released or if no lenses are ever released as confirmed, then its clearly false or misleadibg advertising, as the official comments on those matters give a misleading impression.
“Vision” as a term may be puffery, but there’s no going around the other matters I raised as misleading statements, if not clear cut false advertising. Only time will tell for sure.
And i’m not here to sue Pimax or backcharge them for financial gain, I just hate companies lying and misleading consumers. Lying in general is one of the only things that triggers me.
No new lenses were EVER confirmed. For all we know he could be talking about how there will never be new lenses and he can’t tell us that. Why are you so heated over these new lenses? If it really bothers you just cancel your pre-order.
2 Likes
I assume your taking this same lawsuit to the Oculus forums. They are clearly misleading the community with their Half-dome prototypes
Apparently its illegal for companies to have projects they are working on out of the publics eyes 
2 Likes
You clearly don’t undeestand the concept of misleading advertising creating a misleading impression.
Good we have established Sweviver’s comments on the forum hold the company liable as he is an official representative.
The comment about specifics of product specification (lenses) is misleading, as it talks about new unnanounced developments to the lenses which cannot be talked about. If they were the same lenses, there is no reason they could not talk about them.
Which is why the advertising is misleading and creates a misleading impression, as we’re still getting the same lenses but we were mislead to believe that other lenses are in devopment (Swevivers reply was in response to a question asking about the 8KX)