What is more likely, a percentage, a majority even, of users who CANNOT DISCERN THE LATENCY / LAG ISSUE or there being some variation in the DP cable, DP cable quality, or some other hardware level “gremlin”?
Because that’s basically what you’re stating here, that the issue only affected “some” DP cables.
Do you even understand what you’re trying to explain from a technical perspective?
There is next-to-no variance in DP cables, GPU’s, Displayports, etc etc. and etc. but there sure as hell a variance in PEOPLE’S ABILITY TO DISCERN SAID PHENOMENON.
I am MOST certain this problem plagues ALL 8KX’s and that those who CLAIM they have no problem simply CANNOT DISCERN SAID PROBLEM.
Otherwise, what is the variable?
Some heretofore variation in DP cable transmission strength? Manufacturing defects creating variation in DP ports?
The industry has become so standardized, variation of this sort is incredibly minuscule.
If I disable MSI AB I could potentially live with the latency lag and if it was my first time donning the HMD and I had no reference port I may even consider it just how VR looks and feels and maladapt to it.
In regards to potential hardware variation, Pimax DID make a hardware change with the 8KX (2075 and 2076) I have the older model, there are also TWO separate cables to rule out. So this problem MAY only affect the older 2075 unit with the optical cable on the 90 Hz firmware for all we know and thus, “I don’t have the problem” is coming from people who legitimately do not have the latency problem because they have the newer 2076 unit, or they are only at 75 Hz with the older unit and / or are not using the optical cable.
But to suggest that there is a variance from the DP 1.4a port or Displayport cable itself, I mean how? Does one cable have more copper winding? Were some 1.4a ports damaged somehow? Or is it not hardware variance but the end user’s inability to discern the lag / latency?
Potential variables:
- 8KX model number
- 75 Hz or 90 Hz firmware (although Simultaneous said he tried 75 Hz and the problem exists there as well)
- Optical or original DP + USB cable
- Ability to discern phenomenon
Unlikely variables:
- Variation between Displayport cables
- Variation between Displayports
- Some other unknown hardware level variation
Known variable:
RTX 4090
Remember, Varjo acknowledged the problem even though some Aero owners were completely oblivious to it and the problem 100% AFFECTED ALL UNITS BECAUSE THE PROBLEM STEMS FROM THE WAY THE 4090 HANDLES COMPRESSION / DSC AND ONE 4090 IS NOT GOING TO MAGICALLY HANDLE COMPRESSION / DSC DIFFERENTLY FROM THE OTHERS AS THE ISSUE UNIVERSALLY AFFECTS ALL 4090’s AND AT PRESENT CAN ONLY BE RESOLVED ON THE HMD FIRMWARE SIDE, I.E. VARJO AERO RESOLVING SAID PROBLEM IN ONLY MATTER OF DAYS.
What is more plausible here, the end-users inability to discern the phenomenon or some heretofore undiscovered Displayport hardware variation causing the problem?
Here’s what Pimax can do, they can set up one test machine with an RTX 4090 and one with a 3090 and they can start SteamVR Home and put one HMD on and then take it off and try the other and note the lag / latency with the 4090 or absence of it with the 3090. Why am I suggestion how Pimax investigate the issue? Oh that’s right, they are inept and incompetent and it took their janitor whose side job is their lead sole engineer 6 months to fix their Tundra Tracking Problem.