comfort/compatibility/acceptable H fov/nausea free xp - solid tracking and 144hz/best overall features quality i saw so far/edge2edge clarity, huge vertical fov, best eye relief which helps a lot with fov & clarity
resolution (though current is quite bearable, g2 clearest i tried so far), foveated rendering, more lightweight (950g with CW is too much), better sense of 3d depth (so its most immersive hmd i used, its more about current tech limitation , lack of depth on medium and far distances), Blacks and HDR, grip button steamvr controllers, human eye FOV
realistically speaking i guess aero has chances to be a next daily driver for me, best next level clarity and 773g weight, i would sacrifice a bit of fov as Q2 doesnt bother me. Hope they will manage reprojections and distortion right. Also very appreciate cooling to eliminate fog.
Will also try valves next hmd and psvr2 + nexts oculus
No idea. We still do not know all devices that may possibly be coming, and things announced are still to face independent review. I will say, though, that on the slimmest of slim, and then starved on top, chance that Pimax were to accept my modified p8kX in trade, I would probably consider purchasing a p12k, on the reasoning that even were it to turn out just as unsuitable to my eyes as the p5k and p8kX before it, I could probably sell it on, for my own trade-in deal price, and be no more than the p8kX that I can’t use anyway, poorer. (I should also be receiving a pair of Tilt5 glasses some time the next few months, but those is an entirely different class of device, from VR HMDs. :7)
Working fundamentals: The optics, projection, distortion correction, and brightness/contrast produces something that looks right, and is sharp almost all the way out to the edges of the 110° FOV. Software “just works”.
Well everything could use improvement, of course - including the things that do work pretty well already. :7 The light scatter in the lenses must go - it’s been a object of unbridled hatred from me, ever since the Vive and RiftCV1 turned out to have fresnel lenses. Wouldn’t miss the LCD “blacks” either. (EDIT2: Also grumpy about those last 10° lateral FOV being “stolen” from the binocular overlap bit…)
Comfort in all forms, of course. More resolution and FOV, naturally, but HDR would likely kind of trump them both (gimme all three, please :9), and if there were to be some truth to Bradley’s pie-in-the-sky-gazing about varifocal lenses: Oh yes! -Give me that please! -That would be a step forward second only to lightfield displays. From a larger perspective than any individual device: Software standards must come to make things like support (through various means) for wide FOV, foveation, HDR/wide colour gamut, depth of field, and lightfields, into baseline features, making them exceedingly easy for application developers to implement in their titles (EDIT: It should as closely as possible: “just happen”, as long as you follow normal API interactions.) (EDIT3: Hmm, to be perfectly clear: I am talking OpenXR - not proprietary APIs; No dev should have to specifically support any device; Write once - run everywhere.)
1- Pimax 8KX
2- Pimax 12K Qled
3- FOV and Clarity.
4- More FOV of Couse and handtracking software compatibility.
5- Pimax 12K Qled seems complete with all features that I want but hopes that FOV would be full view (Horizontal and Vertical)
