16K per eye… you funny man.
With good lenses, 4K per eye you already get perfect vision. You don’t even need that much.
Hahahah 16K per eye… man 
1 Like
From what I hear, they will be OLED, so, yeh, different screens.
@Douglaster, Google Stadia equivalent. Definitely not Google Stadia itself since Google have already signed contract with AMD to use their GPU tech exclusively.
3 Likes
Yes, 16k per eye. Humans can typically only perceive 60hz, and yet we have 240hz monitors. Why is that?
Even the colors we can distinguish is significantly less than 16bmillion.
Human range of hearing is from 20 hz to 20000hz, but we have speakers and headphones that go above that. Why is that?
See where I’m going?
So, why do you suppose we need 16k per eye?
1 Like
Ohh. Good to know. Good for AMD.
1 Like
Thats not true, humans can readily percieve images at refresh rates much higher than 60hz.
Being a professional photographer and an audiofile, I must say that what you say is 100% correct, yet when I compared images that are just above human perception to images that far exceed our limits, the higher color depth and higher resolution pictures still look much better. Why? No one really knows. I think our brains perceive reality in a holistic way as opposed to the individual range of our senses. The resolution of our reality is one planck length. If you compared it to the smallest pixel we can make, it would be like comparing a grain of sand to our planet. The colors we “see” are also a thin slice of the spctrum that is out there.Yet some how we are experiencing the “useless” information above our limited senses and getting “reality”. So, 64K resolution with 64 bit color depth HMD by the time I’m 64, BRING IT ON!!! I hope Asus make a cheap quantum computer to run the bloody thing by then.
1 Like