Anybody care to provide a brief summary of anything relevant in the stream?
I am not built to follow that kind of stream for hours but I checked in for literally 3 minutes when Sebastian was talking about the StarVR being the best (soon) available VR headset, so much better than „others“ (then making a very obvious gesture saying as much as „you know which one I mean“).
I had noticed in Sebastian‘s interviews from the Berlin meeting that he responded more happy & eager when people mentioned flaws rather than were coming back positively, so imho we will see a largely negative review from him, though probably not completely damning.
I am okay with that, nothing wrong to point out what could be better.
However, in case these are not completely new, unknown issues but the stuff we already know about in broader terms, what’s the point of coming up with a rather negative review is if there is no headset on the market resolving the various relevant specs in a comparable way, if you look at the package, and therefore this product will give the average user, which today still is a gamer, a significantly better experience that anything else he can afford. Even if the StarVR may be so much better, what‘s the point if it comes in at 3,000$ ? That would be as helpful as telling us in a review of a Ford that the Porsche is oh so much better. Sure, we know that without even checking. But we will not spend the money on this Porsche, not least because there will be new cars around in 2 years which will possibly/likely outperform this year’s Porsche while costing only a fraction of its price.
So what does a review achieve if it were to concentrate on the comparison of what we would like to see in an ideal world rather than checking how it performs compared to the alternatives we really have ?
If Sebastian comes to the conclusion, that he likes the Vive Pro better, fine, that would make sense, because you can expect them to be at least roughly in the same race. It may still be the case that his issues don’t bother me the same way because he may have different standards or use cases.
But just measuring it with a lofty ideal and then telling us that it doesn‘t meet those ideals would be very confusing, if it nevertheless would still be a significant improvement over what we can get otherwise within the same rough price range.
Well, it will be an interesting couple of weeks ahead. For me the even more relevant information will be when regular users start to take their 8K‘s into service at home, and simply use it, without having their analytical error search mode switched on. Because if I applied that to my Rift or Vive, I probably would have stopped playing in VR a year ago out of frustration over the various shortcomings. And the 3rd generation VR headsets wouldn‘t be good enough either…