Sure, nobody blames him for giving his opinion. Nor did I blame the other guy, derDod, for giving his opinion.
But if I take derDod and his review of the 5K+ at the time, compared to the VivePro - he was making fun of the VivePro as offering a petty toiletpaper-roll view he couldn’t imagine to ever go back to.
So now he views a G2 with not so much more FoV than the VivePro as being superior in all sorts of aspects, and the FoV is not really relevant any longer. And he is making fun of the headset which was so great just a couple of months ago that he would make fun of the competing headset then.
But wait, some of those now important aspects, save for of course the resolution/detail/SDE, were probably present in the VivePro too. So back to the ridiculous toilet-paper roll view it is then ? Gosh, who would have thought.
So perhaps his review then was given without enough time to really assess the headsets ? Fair enough. But then I will have to assume the same today, with his assessment of the G2, right ? What will he tell us about it in 6 months from now ? Will he laugh about its ridiculous FoV again or about something else ?
It is this random focus on one or two specs, which then supposingly overshadow everything else, which makes it difficult for me to place much value on a review of such kind. I can fully appreciate that people may not like Pimax headsets, and there are good reasons for that too. But I personally prefer cool-headed consistency from a reviewer, and that’s what I am missing.
Emotions which are not based on objectiveness can blur the picture awfully, and skew decision-making to a degree that I don’t feel very comfortable with it because I might be triggered by very different aspects - or things having happened behind the scenes which won’t happen to me in the same way.
I am not saying that I dislike Seb or derDod, they are both likeable blokes, but if I am supposed to base my purchase decision on their verdict, I would rather wait for further reviews while noting what they said.
And yes, I pre-ordered the G2. But to be frank, it was Ben Lang’s hands-on which pushed me over the line at the end, because I went searching for other reviews again after seeing a small part of Seb’s review. I knew that the Reverb G1 was already a decent headset and the prospect of them ironing out some of the weaknesses was tempting - and the danger of Pimax messing too much up again with the 8KX is threatening at the same time. And I own the Index, but I did not really fall in love with it - it’s good at what it does but it did not give the feeling of an upgrade anywhere, rather getting rid of kinks other some other headsets have here and there. I do wish to see a higher resolution, and then a greater FoV. There lies the 8KX’ chance, and if it stumbles, the G2 will likely cover for it.