Well, it’s the… eye-tracking… The cameras that shoot your eyes, which have nothing to do with the screen and game frame rate – the faster they are, the better they can catch rapid eye movements, and provide material of greater temporal resolution for extrapolating where your gaze is going. :7
So… Remind me, those lucky few among us who have tried the old XTal: Would that be actual 180 degrees of FOV (horizontal, of course), or is it a number pulled out of some piece of anatomy, like Pimax’s 200°? - I seem to recall SweViver made a “reconstruction” sort of picture, that I took to confirm suspicions toward the latter… :7
Yes. That resolution would make one impressive simulator. We tried the new Flight Voyager 180 3D cinema at dream world last week in the Gold Coast. The scale was impressive but I kept thinking next gen VR will blow it away
Thanks for posting. But Im not holding my breath, we have seen XTAL’s demos at these demo shows for the last 2 years and still nothing consumer or price friendly. Now a “new and improved” ? By the time this is ready for prime time, Pimax will have launched a “poor mans” equivalent for 1/4 the price. But a “true” 8K definitely sounds interesting for sure!
Well my fingers got ahead of my brain, I meant it would be nice to see what another 8K headset looks like compared to Pimaxes (2 X 4K) unit ie 8KX/8K+. Be cool to see XTAL’s promoted ( assumed 2 X 4K) with great lenses, minimal distortion, more panel utilization, better IPD setting utilization etc etc
Just keep in mind with Xtal’s 8k it is likely to have similar complaint of low Vertical FoV due to it being 20° wider than Pimax on Large FoV. Just like it’s 5k version.